Beauty is Beyond Looks; It's an Attitude - Rachel Peters
Si Atty. Florin Ternal Hilbay ay isang abogado who served as the Solicitor General of the Philippines during Aquino Administration covering from 2014-2016. He ranked first in the 1999 Philippine Bar.
In his twitter post on Novermber 26, 2017, as quoted:
Kung iisipin natin, wala naman siyang sinabing iba, he was just quoting what MS. Rachel has told. Kaya sa mga ordinaryong analysis, iisipin ng lahat na wala naman meron sa post nya.
The question was, ano kaya yung nais niyang iparating sa tao hinggil sa sinabi ni Ms. Rachel.
The screenshot above is Hilbay's post on November 27, 2017. There is something in his post na parang gusto niyang sabihin na tama lang ang pagkatalo ni Ms. Rachel dahil sa kanyang views about the Political situation in the Country.
OPINION
Dear Atty.
Ms. Rachel Peter is a Representative of the Philippines. Dapat lamang na i-represent niya ang ating bansa at ipakita ang kagandahan, kaayusan nito more than its inconveniences. Parang sa isang mayamang pamilya kapag bumisita ka sa kanila, hindi mo alam may mga problema din sila sa panloob na buhay ng isang pamilya, pero ang kanilang inihaharap sa iyo ay ang kagandahan ng kanilang pamilya.
Similarly, she is representing the entire Philippines and therefore dapat lang na ang kanyang ipamalas, ipakita sa lahat ay ang kagandahan ng ating bansa. Dapat lang na ang mga hindi magagandang bagay sa ating bansa ay nakakubli.
Comparing her Political Views with Mariel De Leon.
De Leon's post is against the Administration, is against the President, kung ating iisipin, it was destructive and uncalled. It is like using her crown to divide the people dahil marami ang umaaantabay sa kanila, marami ang nakikinig sa ano mang kanilang sabihin sa public.
Rachel's comment is not to divide but Unifying in nature and sense. She is calling the people to trust the President dahil ang Pangulo ay nahalal ng taumbayan. Millions of people believes in him that is why he became the President of the Republic. I don't see any reason why there is a need to comment against the President dahil kung tutuusin mo/nating lahat, ang opinyon ng mga against the President ay kakaunti lang kumpara sa mga naniniwalang ang Presidente ay mabuting tao at totoo sa kanyang sinumpaang tungkulin sa bayan -not to betray the Public Trust.
Linking to politics, sabi ko nga sa isang pamilya, madalas ang ipinapakita ay ang kabutihan ng pamilya, therefore Ms. Rachel's comment is Constitutional dahil she is representing the Philippines, She is representing Rodrigo"Roa" Duterte as the current Father of the entire country, while Mariel De Leon's post is like a prodigal daughter to his father/family.
In his twitter post on Novermber 26, 2017, as quoted:
Kung iisipin natin, wala naman siyang sinabing iba, he was just quoting what MS. Rachel has told. Kaya sa mga ordinaryong analysis, iisipin ng lahat na wala naman meron sa post nya.
The question was, ano kaya yung nais niyang iparating sa tao hinggil sa sinabi ni Ms. Rachel.
The screenshot above is Hilbay's post on November 27, 2017. There is something in his post na parang gusto niyang sabihin na tama lang ang pagkatalo ni Ms. Rachel dahil sa kanyang views about the Political situation in the Country.
OPINION
Dear Atty.
Ms. Rachel Peter is a Representative of the Philippines. Dapat lamang na i-represent niya ang ating bansa at ipakita ang kagandahan, kaayusan nito more than its inconveniences. Parang sa isang mayamang pamilya kapag bumisita ka sa kanila, hindi mo alam may mga problema din sila sa panloob na buhay ng isang pamilya, pero ang kanilang inihaharap sa iyo ay ang kagandahan ng kanilang pamilya.
Similarly, she is representing the entire Philippines and therefore dapat lang na ang kanyang ipamalas, ipakita sa lahat ay ang kagandahan ng ating bansa. Dapat lang na ang mga hindi magagandang bagay sa ating bansa ay nakakubli.
Comparing her Political Views with Mariel De Leon.
De Leon's post is against the Administration, is against the President, kung ating iisipin, it was destructive and uncalled. It is like using her crown to divide the people dahil marami ang umaaantabay sa kanila, marami ang nakikinig sa ano mang kanilang sabihin sa public.
Rachel's comment is not to divide but Unifying in nature and sense. She is calling the people to trust the President dahil ang Pangulo ay nahalal ng taumbayan. Millions of people believes in him that is why he became the President of the Republic. I don't see any reason why there is a need to comment against the President dahil kung tutuusin mo/nating lahat, ang opinyon ng mga against the President ay kakaunti lang kumpara sa mga naniniwalang ang Presidente ay mabuting tao at totoo sa kanyang sinumpaang tungkulin sa bayan -not to betray the Public Trust.
Linking to politics, sabi ko nga sa isang pamilya, madalas ang ipinapakita ay ang kabutihan ng pamilya, therefore Ms. Rachel's comment is Constitutional dahil she is representing the Philippines, She is representing Rodrigo"Roa" Duterte as the current Father of the entire country, while Mariel De Leon's post is like a prodigal daughter to his father/family.
Comments
Post a Comment